Head to head · Updated August 13, 2026
Private Internet Access vs Surfshark
Surfshark takes it by 2.5 points, 75.5 against 73.0. That margin is worth reading past — Private Internet Access wins 1 of the seven criteria outright.
The only provider here whose no-logs claim has been tested by a court rather than only by an auditor — but it is a US company.
- From
- $2.03/mo
- Based in
- United States
- Devices
- Unlimited
- Audits
- 1
We earn nothing from Private Internet Access. This link is included because the ranking says it belongs here.
Surfshark
75.5The cheapest credible option per device, weakened by a Nine Eyes jurisdiction and common ownership with NordVPN.
- From
- $2.49/mo
- Based in
- Netherlands
- Devices
- Unlimited
- Audits
- 2
We earn nothing from Surfshark. This link is included because the ranking says it belongs here.
Criterion by criterion
Private Internet Access wins 1, Surfshark wins 3, 3 tied. Each row shows the raw score out of ten and the weighted contribution to the total.
| Criterion | Weight | Private Internet Access | Surfshark | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Independent audit | 20 | 7/10 (14.0) | 8/10 (16.0) | Surfshark |
| Jurisdiction and ownership | 15 | 3/10 (4.5) | 5/10 (7.5) | Surfshark |
| Protocol and crypto stack | 15 | 9/10 (13.5) | 9/10 (13.5) | Tied |
| Leak protection | 15 | 8/10 (12.0) | 8/10 (12.0) | Tied |
| Transparency | 15 | 8/10 (12.0) | 5/10 (7.5) | Private Internet Access |
| Price and refund terms | 10 | 9/10 (9.0) | 9/10 (9.0) | Tied |
| Platform coverage | 10 | 8/10 (8.0) | 10/10 (10.0) | Surfshark |
| Total | 100 | 73.0 | 75.5 | Surfshark |
Where each one actually wins
Private Internet Access is ahead on
- Transparency. All clients are open source and a transparency report is published; signup requires an email address.
Surfshark is ahead on
- Independent audit. Deloitte assured the no-logs claim in 2023; the Cure53 work covered extensions and infrastructure rather than the full apps.
- Jurisdiction and ownership. The Netherlands participates in the Nine Eyes agreement, and the company is now under the same ownership group as NordVPN.
- Platform coverage. Native apps on every major platform including TV, and unlimited simultaneous connections.
Choose Private Internet Access if
Readers who want open-source clients and granular control over encryption settings.
Choose Surfshark if
Households or shared accounts covering many devices on one subscription.
Reasons to pick neither
Skip Private Internet Access if: Your threat model includes US legal process. No amount of open-source client code changes where the company is incorporated.
Skip Surfshark if: Jurisdiction matters to your threat model, or you want a provider independent of Nord Security.
Questions
- Is Private Internet Access or Surfshark better?
- Surfshark scores higher overall, 75.5 against 73.0, a gap of 2.5 points out of 100. That is close enough that the deciding factor should be which criteria matter to you rather than the total.
- Which is cheaper, Private Internet Access or Surfshark?
- Private Internet Access, at $2.03/mo against $2.49/mo. Both rates require committing to the provider’s longest term; the monthly rates are considerably higher.
- Which one has been audited more recently?
- Surfshark, most recently in 2023 against Private Internet Access’s 2022.
- Does jurisdiction differ between them?
- Yes. Private Internet Access operates from United States and Surfshark from Netherlands. Surfshark is outside the Fourteen Eyes agreement; the other is not.
Related comparisons
Comparison generated from the same dataset as the ranking. Emphasis criterion definitions are on the rubric page. Criterion labels: Independent audit, Jurisdiction and ownership, Protocol and crypto stack, Leak protection, Transparency, Price and refund terms, Platform coverage.