1. IVPN
82.510/10 on transparency. A deliberately small, transparent operation that costs more than the market and makes no attempt to hide it.
Against it: One of the smallest server networks in this dataset.
Visit IVPN10 of 11 qualify · Updated August 13, 2026
This page optimises for one thing: how little the provider can reveal, either because it never collected the data or because it operates where collection is hardest to compel. Speed, streaming and price are ignored entirely. A provider that is fast and cheap but holds your email, your card and your IP is not what this page is for.
The rule for this page. Ranked by the transparency criterion, then jurisdiction. Providers with no published audit are excluded.
Answer
10/10 on transparency. A deliberately small, transparent operation that costs more than the market and makes no attempt to hide it.
Visit IVPNWe earn nothing from IVPN. This link is included because the ranking says it belongs here.
| # | Provider | Deciding fact | Transparency | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IVPN Unpaid | 10/10 on transparency | 10/10 | 82.5 |
| 2 | Mullvad Unpaid | 10/10 on transparency | 10/10 | 85.5 |
| 3 | Proton VPN | 9/10 on transparency | 9/10 | 90.0 |
| 4 | Private Internet Access Unpaid | 8/10 on transparency | 8/10 | 73.0 |
| 5 | Windscribe Unpaid | 8/10 on transparency | 8/10 | 67.0 |
| 6 | NordVPN | 6/10 on transparency | 6/10 | 84.0 |
| 7 | ExpressVPN Unpaid | 5/10 on transparency | 5/10 | 74.0 |
| 8 | CyberGhost Unpaid | 5/10 on transparency | 5/10 | 70.0 |
| 9 | Surfshark Unpaid | 5/10 on transparency | 5/10 | 75.5 |
| 10 | PureVPN | 4/10 on transparency | 4/10 | 69.0 |
10/10 on transparency. A deliberately small, transparent operation that costs more than the market and makes no attempt to hide it.
Against it: One of the smallest server networks in this dataset.
Visit IVPN10/10 on transparency. The strongest privacy posture of any provider in this dataset, and the only one we cannot earn a commission from.
Against it: No native app for Apple TV, Android TV or games consoles.
Visit Mullvad9/10 on transparency. The best-documented security stack in this dataset, and the only free tier we consider safe to recommend.
Against it: Refunds are prorated against usage, not returned in full.
Visit Proton VPN8/10 on transparency. The only provider here whose no-logs claim has been tested by a court rather than only by an auditor — but it is a US company.
Against it: United States jurisdiction, inside the Five Eyes agreement.
Visit Private Internet Access8/10 on transparency. Unusually honest about its own incidents, but Canadian jurisdiction and a three-day refund window are real costs.
Against it: Canada is a Five Eyes member state.
Visit WindscribeExcluded providers are named rather than omitted. If one of them is the VPN you already pay for, this tells you exactly which requirement it misses.
| Provider | Why it is not on this list |
|---|---|
| FastestVPN | No published independent audit. |