1. IVPN
82.5Port forwarding with kill switch. A deliberately small, transparent operation that costs more than the market and makes no attempt to hide it.
Against it: One of the smallest server networks in this dataset.
Visit IVPN5 of 11 qualify · Updated August 13, 2026
For peer-to-peer transfer the decisive features are port forwarding, a kill switch that fails closed, and a provider that does not keep connection records. Port forwarding is the filter here because without it a client stays passive and connectable peers drop off. Several major providers removed it, which is why this list is shorter than the ranking.
The rule for this page. Only providers offering port forwarding with a kill switch. Ordered by leak-protection score.
Answer
Port forwarding with kill switch. A deliberately small, transparent operation that costs more than the market and makes no attempt to hide it.
Visit IVPNWe earn nothing from IVPN. This link is included because the ranking says it belongs here.
| # | Provider | Deciding fact | Leak protection | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IVPN Unpaid | Port forwarding with kill switch | 9/10 | 82.5 |
| 2 | Proton VPN | Port forwarding with kill switch | 9/10 | 90.0 |
| 3 | Private Internet Access Unpaid | Port forwarding with kill switch | 8/10 | 73.0 |
| 4 | Windscribe Unpaid | Port forwarding with kill switch | 8/10 | 67.0 |
| 5 | PureVPN | Port forwarding with kill switch | 7/10 | 69.0 |
Port forwarding with kill switch. A deliberately small, transparent operation that costs more than the market and makes no attempt to hide it.
Against it: One of the smallest server networks in this dataset.
Visit IVPNPort forwarding with kill switch. The best-documented security stack in this dataset, and the only free tier we consider safe to recommend.
Against it: Refunds are prorated against usage, not returned in full.
Visit Proton VPNPort forwarding with kill switch. The only provider here whose no-logs claim has been tested by a court rather than only by an auditor — but it is a US company.
Against it: United States jurisdiction, inside the Five Eyes agreement.
Visit Private Internet AccessPort forwarding with kill switch. Unusually honest about its own incidents, but Canadian jurisdiction and a three-day refund window are real costs.
Against it: Canada is a Five Eyes member state.
Visit WindscribePort forwarding with kill switch. Cheap and broadly capable, carrying a documented 2017 logging incident that the current audit arrangement is designed to answer.
Against it: Supplied user logs to the FBI in a 2017 case while advertising a no-logs policy.
Visit PureVPNExcluded providers are named rather than omitted. If one of them is the VPN you already pay for, this tells you exactly which requirement it misses.
| Provider | Why it is not on this list |
|---|---|
| Mullvad | No port forwarding. |
| NordVPN | No port forwarding. |
| Surfshark | No port forwarding. |
| ExpressVPN | No port forwarding. |
| CyberGhost | No port forwarding. |
| FastestVPN | No port forwarding. |